Thanks to everyone who has already responded on and offline.

So it really boils down to the router can forward so many pps  limited by the 
power of the CPU and depending on packet size actual bandwidth may vary?

-Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Benjamin Lovell
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 10:28 AM
To: Seth Mattinen
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GigE Throughput on 3825

Seth is completely correct that it's all about CPU. Don't quote me but I think 
we rate the 3825 at about 300 kpps(number is out of date so newer IOS may not 
reach this number) . This is likely a 0 feature number so it could be much 
lower if QoS, GRE, uRPF, etc, etc, etc are used.

-Ben


This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that 
is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone 
other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this 
electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other 
than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this message in error, please delete the original message in its entirety 
(including any attachments) and notify us immediately by reply email so that we 
may correct our internal records.  Midland Paper Company accepts no 
responsibility for any loss or damage from use of this electronic mail, 
including any damage resulting from a computer virus.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to