-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nick Chettle wrote: > Using multiple RD's is important for convergence when you are using > route-reflectors as a route-reflector will only advertise the "best" > BGP route to it's clients. If you use the same RD for a VPN across > two (Or more) PE's then the route-reflector will see that route as > the same and only pick the one it considers the best. If you use > unique RD's the route-reflector will not consider the routes the same > and will advertise both of them. >
Sure, understand the perils of RR and was just trying to work out what was different in an vpn environment, and the answer it seems is (quite obviously) rda:x.x.x.x != rdb:x.x.x.x and this therefore is being used to get around the bestpath selection problem. I'm personally holding out for a good addpaths implementation :) Dave. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxa6u0ACgkQtFWeqpgEZrLIUACfSz5BWFjfK3aYpAGm7U6UJ90F 3XQAoMqG2AEHC9Q5hUn/STltyr96B05L =ycz6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
