On 08/11/2010 09:02 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Phil Mayers wrote:
We've used ERSPAN on some truly phenomenal bitrates; it *is* done in
hardware.
Sending ERSPAN is done in hw, I've done multigigabit ERSPAN.
ERSPAN reception is not done in HW (at least not when I tested) and it
killed the box when I tried :P
Really? That seems odd.
FWIW we seldom (In fact I'm not sure ever!) use an actual 6500 as an
erspan receiver; we use "gulp" on a Unix box, or the wireshark ERSPAN
decoder, depending on the requirements.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
