Jay I know it might sound ridiculously obvious, but is another T1 out of the question?
On 10 September 2010 19:44, Jay Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't seem to figure out what to do with my situation, wondering if > anyone had encountered this. > > Situation : > Router : 1841 IOS 12.4T or 15.0M > Internet T1, two eth Interfaces > There are VoIP traffic (SIP & RTP) and general internet traffic > > VoIP provider does not tag SIP/RTP with any kind of QoS in IP header. > (DSCP/IPP) Internet provider can do QoS based on IPP but since VoIP > traffic is not marked, it's not useful. > > Problem to solve : how to not drop >ingress< VoIP traffic when > internet traffic is high as much as possible without capping the > non-VoIP traffic to less than T1 bandwidth. > > Caveat : I understand that since it's not getting policed at the > egress from the provider, any solution is not going to be perfect > > I can't limit the traffic on the Eth interface egress because traffic > can go to either eth interface. > > Any thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
