On (2010-09-13 11:08 -0400), Jeremy Reid wrote: > Separate from the original question asked: We did find the true culprit for > what was significantly elevating our RP CPU (BGP process) loads: An IPv6 peer > that was activated under *both* the ipv6 AND ipv4 address-families... Once > the errant ipv4 neighbor activate statement was removed, the session reset > and we shed about 20% overall CPU for BGP router.
Without knowing your IOS, I'm fairly confident you were hitting CSCsy58115. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
