On 17/09/10 17:12, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:52:41AM -0400, Jay Nakamura wrote:
Some hosts/OS can do load balancing between NICs. If a host has two
NICs connected to two switches,(the two switches are connected
together) and load balancing between them, switch will see the same
source MAC from two ports.
Don't do this.
Agreed
If the ports go to two different switches (that cannot do cross-chassis
etherchannel), use active/passive bundling, not load-sharing.
Just for completeness: under OSes like Linux, there are a few
weird/esoteric NIC load-balancing methods that *claim* to work - usually
where all the traffic comes in a single NIC, but is load-balanced out of
multiple NICs with the source MAC address of each egress NIC, not the
attached layer3 interface. I would avoid like the plague and stick to
active/passive.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/