On 09/22/2010 08:53 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 09/22/2010 08:31 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 09/22/2010 01:00 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 22:12 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
2. Use CoPP for everything else; DO NOT use the glean or cef receive
limiter
I'm confused here: Why not use the glean limiter? As I understand it you
can simplify the CoPP maps a lot. (Non-IP traffic like IS-IS still being
a special case of course.)
What am I missing? Is it because you want to catch special cases of
gleaning earlier in the CoPP and differentiate rates?
IIRC the glean limiter is faulty in some fashion on PFC-3B and earlier.
I can never remember the precise details, but I think it's been
discussed on the list in the past, and I've had knowledgeable TAC
engineers tell me "really, don't use it".
Ah yes: egress ACL craziness:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-February/038465.html
For the curious, see also this post and surrounding ones in the most
recent CoPP uber-thread, a cisco-nsp bi-annual event ;o)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg29506.html
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
