Looking at getting a couple of 3945s. NM-16ESW-1GIG is being recommended by one of my colleagues. He prefers the easy of use, not having to session in to the module. It's been pointed out that the router IOS will have to devote some of it's time to the module and perform the switching functions. We would have to get the 3945 as the module is not supported in the 3945E.
The NME-16ES-1GIG is of course a newer generation. The module runs it's own IOS image. PoE is not a requirement. Links to the data sheets: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet09186a00801aca3e.html http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/product_data_sheet0900aecd8028d15f.html How much does the older module affect the performance of the router itself when compared to the newer module? Thank you _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
