> One vendor I need to connect to, I need to advertise a specific /24 > (10.200.16.0/24) to the eBGP neighbor. OF course BGP won't advertise the > route to the eBGP neighbor because the /24 isn't in IGP, only the /16 > summary.
I don't think your going to have much luck. What you are asking, it to put a route in adj-out that is not in the actual routing table. Perhaps you could fake it by hacking around with vrf's or something.. > I can't just set a static null route for the /24, because that would > screw up all traffic going to that subnet through that switch. Can you set a static that points to the correct next-hop? The problem is the router would be advertising a route to a destination that it doesn't actually know about. I can see what your trying to do, but is this really a good practise? > I can't just pull the EIGRP summary at the boundary without causing all > sorts of other fun. Is the problem that when you try to summarise to /24 and /16, the /16 blocks the /24 ? You should be able to do both - it would still be legal - I think this is what you need to investigate further. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
