It will utilize 1 BGP routing table for now...no other dynamic routing. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Brian Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is way too vague to give you an answer. > > Will you run BGP? Are you going to take full BGP routes? Are you going > to run an IGP? Which one? How many routers will be running the IGP? > > This should be enough to start thinking about a good solution. > > - Brian J. > > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > >[email protected]] On Behalf Of Someone Else > >Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:33 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: [c-nsp] Internet Router Recommendations > > > >Hi All, > > > >I'm looking to get a few recommendations for a Cisco router that will > serve > >as an edge IR for a Internet connection starting at 100Mbps...and could > >scale to 200Mbps within the next 3years. > > > > > > > >Thanks!!! > >_______________________________________________ > >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is > for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. Any unauthorized review, > copying, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original > message. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
