If you don't have overlapping TE tunnels ? what is meaning of this
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Peter Rathlev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote: >> I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS >> AutoBandwidth in scenario where I have only 20 subnets max to be sent >> on this Backbone. > > AutoBandwidth gives you the advantage of having the network recalculate > LSPs every now and then. This can (partly) overcome the scenario where > the specific time of establishing an LSP would have a negative effect on > how it's built. > > If you use TE extensively and have one or more paths that are > oversubscribed (via RSVP) then AutoBandwidth may be used to shift around > some of the paths to (maybe) achieve a better utilisation. > > If you don't have overlapping TE tunnels there's no point in using > AutoBandwidth. If you have plenty capacity (i.e. the sum of bandwidth of > all tunnels is less than you "narrowest" link's capacity) there's also > no need IMO. > > I your network is carefully engineered off-line and you never want the > network to change you engineering you also don't need AutoBandwidth. > > -- > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
