Yeah, I know, my bad, I just chose a bad example, sorry for misleading I was actually trying to say that not always the newest is the best... Sorry again for the confusion Ziv
-----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 11:26 AM To: Ziv Leyes Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12.4 for 7205vxr npe-g2 recommendation? Hi, On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:13:43AM +0200, Ziv Leyes wrote: > Does it have to be 12.4? > Why not going for an older, mature, bug free, that gives you all the same > features you need? > Something like c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE or the like Haaahahahaha :-) Very good joke. SRE is 1000x more bleeding edge than 12.4 mainline. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
