On 29/10/2010 23:21, Dean Smith wrote: >> I'm sure it doesn't. Routers are routers, firewalls are firewalls. > > So very narrow minded.
oh all right. I just don't like the idea, that's all. I put this dislike down to excessive exposure to Checkpoint FW-1 + ospf in a previous existence. It still makes me shudder to think about it. But I do admit that routing on firewalls is useful from time to time. Possibly even often. > "low" security interfaces. We too have had to go transparent for this reason > alone in many places but its not always possible. meh, yeah, transparent is somewhat icky. > (Oh and when will we get > an HTTPS inspect on ASA/FWSM!) When Cisco finally manages to implement line-rate SSL decryption? :-) Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
