On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Scott Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you think (or is there evidence) that very many ASs use maxas-limit type > commands? I have never used it and never had any problems...
we do "bgp maxas-limit 50" to avoid as-path triggered bugs. Google around if you want to know why. > Only if they're longer than a /24, though; yes? I imagine no one really > filters shorter than a /24 these days. One might be taking full+default and then table-shaving based on path/prefix-length (drop more specifics that are some AS distance away.) Some have extended the life of older equipment this way. -- Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
