>From memory, G1 L2TP session limit was theoretically around 8k. I have >experience of stability up to that, whilst running the usual BGP/IGP/LDP >combo. G2 doubles to 16k.
However, back to the point, NPE-400 performance will be much lower than that! What are your requirements/expectations Stephane? --Daniel Holme On 3 Dec 2010, at 17:38, "Andrew K." <[email protected]> wrote: > A little hard to compare but I've seen an NPE-G1 hold 4000 sessions with a > 70% average CPU usage. > > Andrew. > > On 12/3/2010 11:32 AM, Stephane MAGAND wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am search a information: >> >> How many L2TP/LNS session (for Adsl pppoe) can support a NPE 400 ? >> >> Thanks >> Stephane >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
