Sorry by KW I just meant keyword meaning IOS command but the shared keyword 
caveat is if you are using standard IPSEC for DMVPN. I can't speak to this part 
of it if you are using GETVPN as I only have conceptual knowledge of GETVPN. 
The mGRE part of it will not have any problem terminating two mGRE tunnels to 
one IP address. 

-Ben
 
On Dec 6, 2010, at 5:17 AM, Tomas Daniska wrote:

> 
> Ben,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benjamin Lovell [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 12:53 PM
>> 
>> Minor correction. Traffic will still be CEF switched but will be
>> software CEF switched not MLS CEF switched.
> 
> yup, got the point from Oli as well.
> 
>> This is a limitation of the EARL 7 generation of forwarding engines.
>> GRE decap can only be done based on dest IP so you need a unique IP
>> endpoint for each tunnel. This is not a problem on any software
>> platform as there is no ASIC to be subject to this limitation.
>> 
>> For DMVPN w/ IPSEC you can use the same IP address for two mGRE
>> tunnels as long as you use the same crypto profile and the shared KW.
> 
> can you elaborate a little more please. 
> 
> (by KW, do you mean the key-string with standard IPSEC protection?)
> 
> What we need to do is terminate two distinct *GETVPNS* at the CE, each in its 
> own VRF. That means, two different GDOI groups, one for each tunnel 
> interface. Sorry if saying 'DMVPN' confused you, I meant the mGRE part of it.
> 
> The reason for mGRE here is that the underlying transport is an L3 VPN from a 
> carrier. We need to integrate these remote sites into an existing GETVPN, 
> that means the hub(s) is going to terminate mGRE only, and GDOI being 
> processed at edges as usually.
> 
> Should I deduct from what you wrote that we need two distinct IPs for each of 
> the mGRE spoke tunnel interfaces? 
> 
> I've tried searching explicit documents on this before, I have found many on 
> DMVPN on 8xx, many on GDOI in VRF on 8xx, but nothing extra on mGRE/VRF/GDOI 
> in combination.
> 
> 
> Thanks much!
> 
> --
> 
> deejay
> 


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to