M(L)PPP is not an option.... Frank
-----Original Message----- From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 4:27 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1 in a DS-3 What's the encapsulation protocol of the T-1's? I would think you could do MPPP and put both T-1's into the same bridge group as the Ethernet interface, but I'm not sure how that would work if it was using HDLC. Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC [email protected] w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] Bridging 802.1q tagged Ethernet traffic to multiple T-1 in a > DS-3 > > Is it possible to use a Cisco 7206VXR to bridge 802.1q tagged Ethernet > traffic to multiple T-1s within a DS-3? The remote end, a RNC, can > apparently take tagged traffic over multiple T-1's. > > We might be willing to live with the restriction of assigning certain T-1's > within the DS-3 to a certain 802.1q, but would like to take advantage of > aggregation. > > Apparently we can't use PVCs, otherwise I would prefer that approach. > > Frank > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
