On 2010-12-12 04:45, Mark Price wrote:
I tested a 3560G-24 to replace 3550 switches doing layer 3 like you are talking about. Ran into TCAM overflow after switching to an ipv4+ipv6 SDM template. The limits advertised are under 'ideal' conditions and not real world as you would suspect. I think using OSPF for your routing greatly reduces the routing resources that SDM templates advertise.
Can you be more specific please? Can you post a TCAM overflow information and the state in which the hardware resources were at that moment? Because from what I understand from your mail, you overflow the TCAMs before the SDM template theoretical limits for FIB. -- "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski If it's not okay, it's not the end." | http://lukasz.bromirski.net _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
