On 14 December 2010 09:34, Phil Mayers <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/14/2010 09:32 AM, Daniel Holme wrote: >> >> On 14 December 2010 00:00, Andriy Bilous<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Don't get all excited, it's 10G only. :/ >> >> Starting a new thread because we're going well OT. >> >> Andy, if you mean up to 10G ports, then that's okay by me. > > Yes, joy of joys, a more expensive, lower-density 10gig option for the 6500 > ;o)
It should work out more cost effective than say a SIP-400 with 1-port 10G SPA for VPLS services (which I'm told will actually only do up to 4.4G). I do find it odd that they're going to introduce the support in the first place however, it seems to me that they're just decreasing the divide between 6500 and 7600 that they created in the first place by splitting the products & software. But hey, let's not go there! -- Daniel Holme _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
