On 12/14/10 6:54 AM, Garry wrote: > <rant> > Having just installed a set of nice ASR1k boxes with rather new IOS, I > noticed Cisco has still (after many years and many IOS releases) not > managed to get Backup Interfaces & IPv6 to work with each other ... or > I'm missing something ... but while IPv4 addresses on backup interfaces > work just fine, IPv6 config will lead to the backup interface to no come > up due to the IP address overlapping with the IP address of the primary > interface (what a surprise - it's the BACKUP INTERFACE, for crying out > loud ...) > > With Cisco presenting themselves and their hardware oh so v6-ready > (which they are for most parts I guess - all other features at least we > require for production use seem perfectly fine), I'm really starting to > wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual > switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ... > </rant> >
Have you tried: ipv6 address 2001:0DB8:107:400::1/64 anycast This will suppress duplicate address detection. ~Seth _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
