[adding the list]
So none of the routes are being installed on RouterA from the BGP table into the RIB? all the routes are marked as RIB failure in the BGP table of RouterA? I remember there being a debug that will show you why a route isn't installed into the routing table from BGP, but I can't remember what it is and I don't have access to a box at the moment to look it up, but I think it's "debug ip bgp update" or "debug ip bgp event" but I could be totally wrong. The other things I would think of are the common IPv4 issues, which are sync enabled, next hop (which we covered) and OSPF RID != BGP RID. Have you tried it without route reflectors in the mix? Do you see the same problem? -Pete On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Jimmy Changa <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, pingable also ;) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Pete Lumbis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Random guess, but are the BGP next hops reachable by the RR? >> >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jimmy Changa >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I have a router (routerA) that is a route-reflector client to two upstream >>> routers (routerb and routerc). The 3 routers have full IPv6 BGP tables, >>> however if I look at routerA's routing table, there are not BGP routes in >>> it. While I can see the route for say, ipv6.google.com, the router says it >>> has not route to the site. >>> >>> Any thoughts on what might be the issue? >>> >>> Jimmy >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
