On 04/01/11 15:12, Phil Mayers wrote:
- various hooks are shoved in to transport and handle PIM and mroutes on a per-VRF basis OOB
I should also add - AFACIT you can't do per-VRF mroutes (i.e. a different routing table used for the multicast RPF check) in the MVPN model. This might be an issue if you want a different unicast versus multicast topology.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
