On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Alan Buxey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Have you looked at the 2960S series? �I am doing some testing with > them > > and I'm pleased with them as a middle step before the 3750. �They are > > built on the 2960 which is more reliable than the 2970 was and they > are > > stackable as well, although 10G and not 64/128G like the 3750. > > for their purpose, 3750e are being used. we are using 2960s but at the > access layer > (slowly getting rid of 2950 and pre-S 2960 edge switches). 2960S is quite > limited > really - only 4 can be members of the stack, the stack is only 10G, the > interfacing options are weaker and they dont have the suite of security > features > that the 3750E/3750X offer...hence why we're 3750e/X at the distribution. > ...we are also quite eager for the latest IOS for the 2960S as they have > plenty of > issues that need ironing out ;-) > It sounded like you had gone from 2970's all the way to 3750's. The 2970's are heavily over subscribed and not stackable. The 2960s seemed like a good replacement since it is stackable and I believe less oversubscribed than the 2970. Can you elaborate on some of the bugs you've encountered with the 2960S? All I've tested so far is vanilla layer-2 with etherchannel uplinks, so I haven't found much. > > alan > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
