I found out that these are the 40-port GigE SFP blade and the 8-port 10Gig blades. Cisco advised us to go from 3.7.3 to 3.9.2 for now instead of jumping straight to 4.0.1. We'll give that a whirl tomorrow.
I've heard lots of great things about the ASR 9K, but I have to say that IOS-XR is ugly, ugly, ugly. I'm still looking forward to getting some of these bad boys fired up in production, though. The ugliness of the CLI will wear off with familiarity, I'm sure. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Jared Mauch <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless there is a compelling reason otherwise, you should really be on 4.0.1 > on ASR9K. > > Stuff like the 8-Port 10G cards are not supported in 3.7.3, amongst other > limitations you will encounter. > > - Jared > > On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:52 PM, John Neiberger wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:45 PM, John Neiberger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Chris Evans <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Dumb question. But you powered it with 220 I hope... >>> >>> These are all good questions. I'll go ask the engineer who is >>> currently working on this. >>> >> >> These are powered with 220. We're running 3.7.3 code. I'm waiting on a >> reply from our engineer to get the output of show platform and show >> diag. >> >> Thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
