Good to know, thanks a lot! On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Tim Franklin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > AFAIK, WAAS (4.1.3) is not able to optimise CIFS when SMB signing or > > digital > > signatures are enabled. Is it correct? > > Correct. If the WAAS could transparently alter the packets in-flight, this > would rather defeat the purpose of digital signatures! > > > Do i need to disable default Microsoft SMB signature to get optimal > > CIFS > > optimisation? > > Yes, you do. I've been through this exercise with a customer recently, and > it makes quite a difference to the CIFS performance, even between two fairly > well-connected sites. > > Regards, > Tim. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
