I don't mean to be disrespectful in this "Cisco" list, but perhaps you should sharpen your question. Are you asking what is the next "Cisco" next 6500/7600, or in general, because I must remind you all that there are some other platforms out there that can be good replacement for those good ole friends... I'm not going to throw brand names, is not my intention...
Ziv On 4 Feb 2011, at 16:22, Mack McBride <[email protected]> wrote: > The most comparable for the 7600 is the ASR 9K but the cost differential is > significant. > > The Nexus 7000 is supposed to replace the 6500 for an aggregation > switch but the cost and other issues (bugs and lack of XL card) has slowed > adoption. > The other issues are getting sorted out which should help the 7K. > Cisco seems committed to the 6500 as a services platform. > So it is likely to be around for a long time. > > Our company tends to stay away from the bleeding edge so we are still using > the 6500/7600. > > Mack McBride > Network Architect > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 6:12 AM > To: cisco-nsp > Subject: [c-nsp] Opinions about the next 6500/7600 > > Howdy, > > I think most folks can agree that the amount of traffic on the Internet is > being carried by 6500/7600 series gear is probably a pretty big percentage. > This is most likely mainly due to cost, density, and performance (despite > their flaws). The other nice thing about them is that they are everywhere, so > they have a good community of users. > > What new platform from Cisco or whomever do you think is, or will become the > "next 6500/7600" in terms of how many companies are going to use them, > performance, cost, density? I don't have any hard numbers to back this up > (aside from earnings numbers from Cisco) but I'm guessing the number of Nexus > 7000s replacing 6500s has been pretty disappointing to Cisco. > > So is the 6500 = Nexus 7000 and the 7600 = ASR 9K or does the flow chart skew? > > thanks, > -Drew > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ The information contained in this e-mail message and its attachments is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender, and then delete the message from your computer. Thank you! ******** This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.******** ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
