If you look at the spec sheets you will notice a few differences. MAC table size, default DRAM, routing performance, etc http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html
Most of the other differences are very small and scenario specific. Some could even be as minor as some errata required a software workaround in 3B but where then addressed in 3C. These are not the kinds of things we doc publicly. Some less minor ones off the top of my head that *may be documented but not in a single doc that contrasts 3B and 3C. support for vlan hash on etherchannel VSS - only 3C cards can be the VSL in a VSS setup. MPLS QoS EXP rewrite changes - in short PFC3B can only rewrite EXP in IP2MPLS path. PFC3C can rewrite both. Those are the only ones I have run across that I can think of. -Ben On Feb 15, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > Are there any release notes out there for the 6500 that indicates > changes/fixes between the B and C versions of the EARL7? I've found a > few things, but nothing exceedingly useful beyond "C is the newest one". > > ~Seth > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
