I don't know that there is a hard and fast port-channel hashing best practice. It all depends on your traffic patters and what's best for you.
I guess the most obvious question would be is your link load approx even? If not does the highest loaded one see any drops? -Ben On Mar 7, 2011, at 7:58 PM, Christian MacNevin wrote: > HI > > So I'm seeing some weird problems with a video conf product and it definitely > seems to be down to network location. > > Part of what I'm looking at is that we're port channeling between a 65 and a > 4900. The 65 is configured to use: > > port-channel per-module load-balance > port-channel load-balance src-dst-mixed-ip-port > > Is that more or less considered best practice these days? Obviously there's a > mix of UDP latency sensitive stuff and TCP on the line. > > Cheers > Christian. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
