On 14/03/2011 17:42, Paul Wozney wrote:
Scalability? none.
Performance? poor.
Stability? questionable.
Maybe I shouldn't have phrased my last email like I did. Let me rephrase
in language which doesn't involve mildly amused understatement:
--
Your proposed network structure is nothing short of a disaster waiting to
happen. The question is not whether it will break, but *when* it will
break, and whether it will be possible resuscitate it after it breaks. If
you go ahead with your plans to build a network like this, your management
will be fully justified in firing you for causing substantial and prolonged
business disruption.
Do yourself a favour and hire a competent network consultant to advise you.
There are lots of ways to make networks work well. Your proposal is not
one of them.
--
apologies for being so blunt about this, but you will do yourself and your
organisation no favours by daisy-chaining 28 switches.
Nick
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
