On 3/26/2011 3:27 PM, Tim Stevenson wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Removing the DFC from a 65xx card & letting the PFC do the work is HIGHLY > preferable > to letting traffic punt for your shortest mask prefixes, which are the ones > that won't > get into the h/w if you blow out the FIB TCAM.
Follow-up summary... kudos to Tim for the clear list of options. I have taken custody of the problem daughtercard away from the GBIC blade and all is well... $0 budget upgrade :) > Router#show platform hardware capacity system > System Resources > *PFC operating mode: PFC3CXL* > Supervisor redundancy mode: administratively sso, operationally sso > Switching resources: Module Part number Series CEF mode > 3 WS-X6516-GBIC CEF256 CEF > 5 VS-S720-10G supervisor CEF > 6 VS-S720-10G supervisor CEF > Router#show platform hardware capacity pfc > L2 Forwarding Resources > MAC Table usage: Module Collisions Total Used %Used > 5 0 98304 3 1% > 6 0 98304 4 1% > > VPN CAM usage: Total Used %Used > 512 0 0% > *L3 Forwarding Resources > FIB TCAM usage: Total Used %Used > 72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 524288 25 1% > 144 bits (IP mcast, IPv6) 262144 8 > 1%* > > detail: Protocol Used %Used > IPv4 25 1% > MPLS 0 0% > EoM 0 0% > > IPv6 1 1% > IPv4 mcast 4 1% > IPv6 mcast 3 1% > > Adjacency usage: Total Used %Used > 1048576 167 1% Jeff _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
