Thanks for the feedback, and yeah, I agree that a lack of IPv6 support is slack. We're seeing a keen interest from various customers at the moment.
Has anyone got any happy stories about the ME3600X?!?? LH -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 28 March 2011 22:00 To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] New Joiner - ME3600X and tools Back in November when I questioned our Cisco account rep while I was purchasing a half dozen of these, I was told ~summer of '11 for IPv6 on the ME3600X... I'm sure that's been pushed back based on newer feedback it seems people are getting. This is most unfortunate. I don't understand how Cisco can ignore IPv6 on newer products like this. It is indeed totally unacceptable and does make these L2 only having to rely on something else to do IPv6 in L3 the access layer. :( -Vinny -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:36 PM To: 'Jon Harald Bøvre' Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] New Joiner - ME3600X and tools > IPv6 supported? No. Probably coming in october this year. Last I heard was 'sometime 2012' for IPv6 support -- Totally unacceptable for any device doing L3 in SP environments, IMO -- so I consider it a L2-only box. -A _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
