Cisco.com is working from india too. Regards Shivlu Jain
Sent from my iPhone On 10 Apr 2011, at 13:08, [email protected] wrote: > Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Ctrl Shift 6 X (Access-Server) (Alessandro Braga) > 2. Re: Cisco 12410 vs XR-12410 routers (Drew Weaver) > 3. cisco web site down ? (John Brown) > 4. Re: cisco web site down ? (Jeff Orr) > 5. Re: cisco web site down ? (Engelhard) > 6. Re: cisco web site down ? (Sungmin Cho (smcho)) > 7. Re: Cisco 12410 vs XR-12410 routers (Dobbins, Roland) > 8. Re: Safer DDOS drops (Scott Granados) > 9. Re: Safer DDOS drops (Ziv Leyes) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 13:45:54 -0300 > From: Alessandro Braga <[email protected]> > To: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> > Subject: [c-nsp] Ctrl Shift 6 X (Access-Server) > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Folks, > > how can I switch devices using Cisco Access Server and Terminal for Mac with > US international layout ? > > > > Thanks in advance, > -AB > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 18:20:36 -0400 > From: Drew Weaver <[email protected]> > To: "'Lee Starnes'" <[email protected]>, "Dobbins, Roland" > <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12410 vs XR-12410 routers > Message-ID: <F3318834F1F89D46857972DD4B411D70020C4567FC@exchange> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Lee, > > If you are talking about buying new routers today, GSRs probably don't make > sense (especially for 1 and 10G). > > Keep in mind that the fastest SIP for a 12810 is the SIP-600/601 which is a > 10G full-duplex SIP. > > This means that if you put two 10G interfaces in a SIP-600/601 that you will > be oversubscribed 2:1. > > and that the maximum 10G density for a 10 slot chassis is really paltry for > the amount of money you would be paying for these routers. > > and if you absolutely have to buy a GSR, don't buy a 12810 because of the > caveat mentioned above there is no real-world difference between a 12410 and > a 12810. (especially for 1 and 10G) > > (Plus finding parts, even new parts for a 12810 is really really awful). > > I believe there is a single Engine6 card available that takes advantage of > the 12810's enhanced "width" but it's not a 10G card, OC-XXX. > >> From an investment standpoint you may be better off going with an ASR9 and >> if you have the budget I hear CRS-1 is nice too =) > > -Drew > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee Starnes > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:41 PM > To: Dobbins, Roland > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12410 vs XR-12410 routers > > Thanks Roland! So is that to say that the IOS-XR does NOT run on the > 12410/12810 routers? > > -Lee > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Dobbins, Roland <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 9, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Lee Starnes wrote: >> >>> Just trying to determine which direction to go. >> >> Cisco's direction for GSR is XR; you aren't going to get any new features, >> and slow bug fixes, if you try to stay on IOS. >> >> For example, NetFlow telemetry for native IPv6 traffic is only available >> under XR for the GSR. There are no plans to support this functionality on >> the platform under IOS. >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> >> >> The basis of optimism is sheer terror. >> >> -- Oscar Wilde >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 17:37:14 -0600 > From: "John Brown" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: [c-nsp] cisco web site down ? > Message-ID: > <F70BCC55F4F2F14888D450E441159C241F6621@deathstar2.citylinkfiber.intra> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > I tried from my Cell phone as well. Dead > > http://www.cisco.com > > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access / on this server. > Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use > an ErrorDocument to handle the request. > ________________________________________ > Apache/2.0 Server at www.cisco.com Port 80 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:43:57 -0400 > From: Jeff Orr <[email protected]> > To: John Brown <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco web site down ? > Message-ID: <839841172430210454@unknownmsgid> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Cisco.com mobile and full working here in Ohio... > > Sent from my AT&T iPhone > > On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:39 PM, John Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I tried from my Cell phone as well. Dead >> >> http://www.cisco.com >> >> Forbidden >> You don't have permission to access / on this server. >> Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use >> an ErrorDocument to handle the request. >> ________________________________________ >> Apache/2.0 Server at www.cisco.com Port 80 >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:00:30 +0900 > From: Engelhard <[email protected]> > To: Jeff Orr <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco web site down ? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > I can see the Cisco mobile web from Japan. No issue at the accessibility. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2011/04/10, at 8:43, Jeff Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Cisco.com mobile and full working here in Ohio... >> >> Sent from my AT&T iPhone >> >> On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:39 PM, John Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I tried from my Cell phone as well. Dead >>> >>> http://www.cisco.com >>> >>> Forbidden >>> You don't have permission to access / on this server. >>> Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use >>> an ErrorDocument to handle the request. >>> ________________________________________ >>> Apache/2.0 Server at www.cisco.com Port 80 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:47:02 +0900 > From: "Sungmin Cho (smcho)" <[email protected]> > To: Engelhard <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco web site down ? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" > > It works as well in Korea by mobile. > > ?? iPhone?? ?? > > 2011. 4. 10. ?? 10:00 Engelhard <[email protected]> ??: > >> I can see the Cisco mobile web from Japan. No issue at the accessibility. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2011/04/10, at 8:43, Jeff Orr <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Cisco.com mobile and full working here in Ohio... >>> >>> Sent from my AT&T iPhone >>> >>> On Apr 9, 2011, at 7:39 PM, John Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I tried from my Cell phone as well. Dead >>>> >>>> http://www.cisco.com >>>> >>>> Forbidden >>>> You don't have permission to access / on this server. >>>> Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use >>>> an ErrorDocument to handle the request. >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> Apache/2.0 Server at www.cisco.com Port 80 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 04:24:10 +0000 > From: "Dobbins, Roland" <[email protected]> > To: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12410 vs XR-12410 routers > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > On Apr 10, 2011, at 5:20 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: > >> I believe there is a single Engine6 card available that takes advantage of >> the 12810's enhanced "width" but it's not a 10G card, OC-XXX. > > These may have issues with NetFlow, FYI. > >> From an investment standpoint you may be better off going with an ASR9 and >> if you have the budget I hear CRS-1 is nice too =) > > > Both of these do NetFlow well, FWIW. > > ;> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> > > The basis of optimism is sheer terror. > > -- Oscar Wilde > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:19:20 -0700 > From: Scott Granados <[email protected]> > To: Stig Meireles Johansen <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Safer DDOS drops > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Some say he fixes networks when not driving Formula cars, others think he > wears a black suit and appears on Top Gear and secretly has a 6509 chassis as > a coffee table in the top gear trailer. > > We call him the Stig! > > :) > > On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Stig Meireles Johansen wrote: > >> FWIW, The "no ip unreachables" has to be configured on your uplinks for it >> to have any effect in this setting. >> >> /Stig >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz >> Sent: 9. april 2011 00:45 >> To: 'Peter Rathlev' >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Safer DDOS drops >> >> Brandon, Peter, Phil thanks.. >> >> I removed 'ip accounting access-violations', used the fragments filter, and >> changed to ' mls rate-limit unicast ip icmp unreachable acl-drop 0' .. >> another >5Gbps attack in progress currently, but router CPU is happy and >> customer still in service. >> >> -peter >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 10:39:24 +0300 > From: Ziv Leyes <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Safer DDOS drops > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Soooo, HE'S the mysterious Stig!!! Thanks Scott ! Now I can sleep better, > knowing the truth! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Granados > Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 9:19 AM > To: Stig Meireles Johansen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Safer DDOS drops > > Some say he fixes networks when not driving Formula cars, others think he > wears a black suit and appears on Top Gear and secretly has a 6509 chassis as > a coffee table in the top gear trailer. > > We call him the Stig! > > :) > > On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Stig Meireles Johansen wrote: > >> FWIW, The "no ip unreachables" has to be configured on your uplinks for it >> to have any effect in this setting. >> >> /Stig >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz >> Sent: 9. april 2011 00:45 >> To: 'Peter Rathlev' >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Safer DDOS drops >> >> Brandon, Peter, Phil thanks.. >> >> I removed 'ip accounting access-violations', used the fragments filter, and >> changed to ' mls rate-limit unicast ip icmp unreachable acl-drop 0' .. >> another >5Gbps attack in progress currently, but router CPU is happy and >> customer still in service. >> >> -peter >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp > Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. > ************************************************************************************ > > > > > The information contained in this e-mail message and its attachments is > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the > sender, and then delete the message from your computer. Thank you! > > ******** This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.******** > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > ************************************************************************************ > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 101, Issue 21 > ****************************************** _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
