On 04/24/2011 08:25 PM, Anton Kapela wrote:
2011/4/19 Jon Harald Bøvre<j...@bovre.no>:
Done similar to this with SXF (for FTTH rollout):
[snip]
this modem works quite well for hosting, FTTx/wan-edge, etc. I make
substantial use of it, too, in similar (hosting, etc) situations too.
It certainly is a promising idea for my use-case.
To be honest though, I'm a little surprised it works on hardware-based
platforms. I assume that it's basically driven by the adjacency table,
i.e. it's equivalent to doing:
ip route x.x.x.x VlanYYY
...when IP x.x.x.x is learned via ARP on un-numbered vlan YYY.
Thanks for the pointers all!
Have *not* tried with IPv6, so cannot comment re: outcomes there.
I'll have to test this, but I'm assuming since they're separate SVIs,
you could run un-numbered from the shared IPv4 range, but give each SVI
its own IPv6.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
