On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 13:44 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: > Just in case they're related (are you running redundant Sups or VSS?), > let me throw this one in the mix...
No redundancy and no VSS of any kind on my side. > I have an open case regarding EIGRP route-flapping on a 3750 stack, > which ended up being CPU starvation due to configuration management > (!). ... > If you monitor the "show proc cpu sort" during the changes, you end up > with a consistently high CPU utilization by the "hulc running con" > process, which is responsible for making the configuration changes and > populating it to the other stack members. I was looking for something similar, but there seems to be no process taking up any significant amount of CPU time. Which is what has me stumped. -- Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
