Tassos, It is supported. I just replicated your issue in a lab, and fixed it (took a peek at your case with TAC, so cheating a bit...)
You need to enable IPv6 on the interface which would be used as the next hop, otherwise, how do you expect to be able to have the IPv6 AF enabled... It's a bit weird to me as well, but as soon as I configured an IPv6 address on the interface, the session came up and all started to work. Arie -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 22:00 To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] Does IOS-XR support exchange of IPv6 prefixes over an IPv4BGP peering Can someone verify whether it's possible to exchange IPv6 prefixes over an IPv4 BGP peering in IOS-XR? According to an old doc in http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.3/conversion/referenc e/guide/cn33main.html#wp1028960 *Note *A given address family is only supported with a neighbor whose address is from that address family. For instance, IPv4 neighbors support IPv4 unicast and multicast address families, and IPv6 neighbors support IPv6 unicast and multicast address families. However, you cannot exchange IPv6 routing information with an IPv4 neighbor and vice versa. -- Tassos _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
