On 26/05/2011 17:20, Brian Roche wrote:
Thanks for the advice. I understand the model is limited but it looks like it is geared towards a network of our size. We're just accepting default from the upstream providers so not too worried about the size of the routing table. Mostly concerned if there are NAT/PBR/BGP limitations.
Keep it in mind that if at some stage, you get more than one upstream transit provider, your choice of hardware will become more important. If you see a likelihood of this happening within the equipment depreciation lifetime, then I'd recommend getting an ESP10 instead.
Also, bear in mind that once you've depreciated the kit off your books, an ESP2.5/5 is going to be worth very little on ebay in 3-5 years time, whereas an ESP10 based box is going to maintain its value much better.
Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
