but a useful compromise could be through the use of an 'aim' module. not quite asa-esque performance, but could provide greater flexibility if gre/dmvpn/etc. is needed.
q. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Rothera Sent: 26 May, 2011 11:50 To: Scott Voll Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best solution for WAN backup ASA's have better throughput when encrypting traffic than routers as routers have to do all the work on CPU where as the ASA's will have dedicated crypto hardware. What kind of speeds would you need over the VPN? David On 26 May 2011, at 19:18, Scott Voll wrote: > I have a Metro Ethernet connection to all my sites but they are all hub and > spoke. if I lose a link that site goes down. > > I have basic ISP service available at each of my remote sites and would like > to setup a backup link over a VPN connection. I talked to someone, and I > can't remember what they said. I thought about ASA's but they said using a > router with VPN service was a better option. Can anyone tell me what they > were talking about? they said with the routers you have better options for > Routing. > > TIA > > Scott > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
