I thought the memory requirement might high but the total memory for /48 range routes and couple of static routes [show memory summary | inc IPv6] summing up only around ~4mb
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Justin M. Streiner <strei...@cluebyfour.org>wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote: > > what is the current industry practices in IPv6 inbound prefix filter is >> it >> /32 or /48 ? or it depends on the global IPv6 prefix growth vs memory ? >> > > As always, your experience may vary, but it seems like many operators are > starting to settle on /48 as the cutoff point. This seems reasonable to me, > since some of the RIRs are also settling on /48 as the smallest prefix they > will allocate. That said, there are some people who don't filter (much), so > it's not unusual to see smaller prefixes show up in the global v6 view. > > jms > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/