I've always got the best results using a crowbar
First time you approach the user with the crowbar in hand, and tell him, in a 
calm, polite way, that he should refrain from doing that again, whatever it was 
he was doing
Second time, after finding out he persisted with his unwanted activity, you pay 
him a visit, come calm, and without saying a single word, smash his computer 
screen with the crowbar, in front of him (very important), and go away the same 
calm way you came.
Third time (on most cases this won't be needed) you beat the heck out of him 
with the crowbar and go to jail with a huge smile on your face...

Ziv

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin Cullimore
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 2:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Following Up on Netflow Information

On 7/8/2011 11:58 AM, Jeff Cartier wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This might be a little off-topic to Cisco, but what the heck.
>
> I'm just curious as to how 'you' would go about tracking down a user that 
> *may* possibly be downloading large amounts of data causing congestion on a 
> link.  For instance, I had a case this morning with an internal IP address of 
> 10.x.x.x that showed a 900MB conversation over TCP 80 (HTTP) to an ip address 
> of 174.120.5.220.
>
> Great - so its not that hard to track down the internal user.  Yell at him to 
> stop, talking to him about what he's doing to the network.  No biggie.
>
> I'm more curious about options/tools available to find out what he was doing. 
>  I know that he was downloading something, I know that it was over HTTP and I 
> know the outside IP address he was accessing.  So I start off by looking at 
> 174.120.5.220.  I can check the A record which tells me nothing....
> Name:    dc.5.78ae.static.theplanet.com....
I've encountered organizations that use commercial grade applications to 
proactively track this data, such as 
lancope(Stealthwatch)/riverbed(ManageEngine)/sourcefire(RNA). They enjoy 
some success when dealing with situations similar to those you describe, 
since these tools track netflow data over time, allowing profiles to be 
constructed (which may well contain the information you seek). Some of 
them integrate with user directories, which would certainly improve your 
chances. For customers without budget money, I've also deployed ntop 
rather effectively.
>
> I can't browse to that IP address.  I can see who owns that IP address (XO 
> Communications) though, but in this case its all useless.
>
> The question, more or less, is do I have any options to keep moving forward 
> in finding out what this user was actually doing?
It depends how long your organization stores log entries. Without a 
proactive monitoring tool in place, you'll almost certainly need to 
interface with individuals managing other parts of the infrastructure 
such as dhcp servers and/or snmp collectors and/or firewalls. The list 
of options often depends upon the higher-level details. As other posters 
have noted, it's difficult to outdo packet capture data when you're 
seeking actual insight.
> Thanks in advance!
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail contains proprietary information some or all of which 
> may be legally privileged.  It is for the intended recipient only. If an 
> addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify 
> the author by replying to this e-mail.  If you are not the intended recipient 
> you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or rely on this e-mail.
>
> This message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses, Spam, and 
> Explicit Content.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




The information contained in this e-mail message and its attachments is 
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender, and then 
delete the message from your computer.  Thank you!

******** This mail was sent via Mail-SeCure System.********



 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to