On Thursday, July 07, 2011 01:38:38 AM Derick Winkworth wrote: > I thought about that, but then decided not to recommend > it. Its definitely the simplest, but its also not > really the best design in my opinion. If only Cisco > had a smaller unit that could do MPLS VPNs *and* VPLS. > That would seem more strategic in nature than patching > it now with a vlan or pseudowire.
ME3600X/3800X? Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
