Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:38:56PM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote: > This is an important point IMO. If you don't need any kind of traffic > differentiation and have ample bandwidth there should be no problems > with small buffers.
Unless you have many-to-one traffic with micro bursts. Which was our
problem with the 2960 - the 1-second-average of the ingress ports would
have nicely fit the egress ports (with a big margin), but the traffic
was bursty enough to cause significant egress drops.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp23Yusyh05q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
