If I have the option to engineer to our requirements I would use cisco at the edge and Juniper at the core.
Cheers Ryan From: Derick Winkworth [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 9:08 AM To: Gert Doering; Ryan Finnesey Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco Engineer to your requirements. Cisco and Juniper are good vendors to have for variety. Derick Winkworth CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721 http://blinking-network.blogspot.com _____ From: Gert Doering <[email protected]> To: Ryan Finnesey <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Fri, August 12, 2011 2:52:44 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco Hi, On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:00:32PM -0400, Ryan Finnesey wrote: > What would be your preference between just Cisco or Juniper "depends on what you want to do with it" Recently, OS and TAC support quality at Juniper seriously went down the drain, so the original reason to want Juniper "high quality operating system and very motivated company to iron out the remaining wrinkles" seems to have been lost... OTOH, Cisco is still stuck in "we have too many operating systems and we spend half our resources with BU in-fighting" mode - which, I guess, will now be fixed by firing 10.000 folks from engineering so they won't get in the way of the in-fighting anymore... Right now, I'm not sure I'm trusting either company enough. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
