On 2011-09-27, at 4:17 PM, Martin T wrote:

> Hello,
> there are providers like Flexoptix(http://www.flexoptix.net) who are
> able to flash SFP EEPROM memory with different vendor data, probably
> set custom serial numbers etc. However, why is such service needed at
> nowadays for Cisco equipment? Every router/switch I have seen supports
> the "service unsupported-transceiver"(should turn of checking the
> "Cisco Quality ID") and "no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid"
> commands and thus doesn't check the ID code in EEPROM..

Just because a third party optic is recognized (by way of EEPROM flash or 
service unsupported-transceiver) by your gear, it doesn't automatically mean 
that it will perform on par with a genuine optic.

When we started our 10GE foray last year, we had no end of problems with third 
party optics.  It wasn't until we ran the optics through RFC2544 tests back to 
back and in our gear that we were able to differentiate the good ones from the 
bad ones.  We do this routinely for our 10G and 1G (duplex, Bidi and T) 
whenever we get a batch of SFPs that we don't recognize.

If you don't fully test your optics, you will be plagued with small little 
niggling issues that can't really be identified with any degree of certainty.  
I've found that as the bit rates go up, it's more imperative than ever to test 
absolutely everything.  The smallest little defect can manifest itself in so 
many different ways.

The investment in RF2544 testers and OTDR testers has paid itself back in full, 
repeatedly.

> Last but not least, does SmartNet require you to use Cisco branded
> transceivers? I have heard that this is true only in case the fault or
> unexpected behaviour is related to transceiver..

Use whatever optic you want, but if you're going to open a TAC case, they'll 
ask you to put a Cisco optic in before they do something like RMA a line card.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to