I agree, except that it fixed the issues we were seeing. I hadn't heard of disabling CEF as an actual fix for a problem for many many years... then we saw it here with the 1921's and various IPSec scenarios.
-Vinny -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GRE over IPSEC loss in IOS 15.x / ISR x9xx Routers On 09/27/2011 12:38 AM, Dustin Schuemann wrote: > Disabling CEF didn't correct the issue. > I'm not surprised. I'm amazed TAC would even suggest it. Disabling CEF on modern IOS isn't sensible. The slower code paths don't get properly tested any more, and whole (large) chunks of functionality only exist as CEF code. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
