Hello everyone, I used c7600s72033-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRE4 to run BFD on port-channels. So yes, there are IOS versions.
While running a single BFD session over a bundle has obvious limitations it is still what all the vendors have implemented. Kind of smallest common denominator as no standard exists to define what "BFD on a bundle" should be. So to be clear, every implementation is proprietary. But the single-session method luckily interoperates. IOS-XR and NX-OS have two different modes on offer, the one with a single BFD session per bundle and one with a BFD session per member link. Regards, Marc > Geert, > > > > > so no, forget BFD and portchannels :-) > > > > not so quickly :-) On NX-OS as well as IOS-XR, two platforms/OS where we > have been running BFD sessions on the linecards, we do support BFD on > channels/bundle, albeit in a proprietary fashion as this is not (yet?) > standardized. As we're still using Layer 3 BFD pkts, now running over > each bundle/channel member, the topologies supported by the specific BFD > over channel implementations are limited, on IOS-XR we can only do > back-to-back bundles (i.e. between two XR devices), NX-OS is a bit more > flexible in this regard. > > So BFD and portchannels is still tricky and limited to some platforms > and topologies, but it's certainly not impossible. > > oli > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Marc Binderberger <[email protected]> Powered by *BSD ;-) _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
