On 11/14/2011 05:15 PM, Mark Mason wrote:
Question of the day... Why turn on netflow in a 6k w/ SUP720-10G if netflow in 6k (minus the SUP2T) is notoriously not good? As Adam Powers from Lancope, I find myself continually tuning netflow aging due to TCAM exceeded log messages (http://netflowninjas.lancope.com/blog/2011/07/lancopes-adam-powers-on-the-netflow-features-of-ciscos-catalyst-6500-supervisor-2t.html).
The limitations are well known and unfortunate. But there are still places where the network traffic and requirements are inside (rather than outside) those limitations. We still find the netflow from our sup720s useful, and would not want to turn it off.
If it doesn't work for you, by all means turn it off. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
