On 24/11/2011 14:38, Nick Ryce wrote: > All I want to do is that if IGP is lost then the subsequent aggregate > routes in BGP are withdrawn, if that makes sense.
You mean, you want the whole world to know every time you have an igp flap? :-D This is not really considered to be good engineering practice. Lots of reasons why, but for a good starting point, google for: "bgp synchronization +site:nanog.org" Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
