Hello: The one limitation of REP is no spanning tree. So, if you're doing anything with a switch connected to two switches on the ring and using STP for redundancy, you'll need to modify your design to use something like a backup interface.
Regards, Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC [email protected] w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ghassan.khalil > Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 6:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] Applying cisco REP > > Dears, > I have a ring using 3400 metro switches with trunks uplinks, this ring has > more > than 128 vlan which exceeds the number supported by PVST so I was forced > not to allow all the vlans through the whole ring to avoid loops. > > I was thinking of going with implementing REP as I have done this before, but > I do not know if REP has any limitations regarding the number of vlans. > > Kindly advise. > Ghassan > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
