Hi,

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:06:39PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> No doubt there are good reasons for all this, and this isn't the
> train-wreck that it sure looks like.

I'm still not convinced that the concept of "one big IOS daemon on
top of Linux and calling this 'modular'" isn't a train wreck in its
own.

But yeah, a common operating system among all routers sharing a common
prefix might look reasonable to mere mortals like us that lack the wisdom
of Cisco BUs.  OTOH, naming boxes was never something where they *really*
excel, like the 7304/7301/7201...

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025                        [email protected]

Attachment: pgpuxGO2YBve0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to