The 67XX/69XX cards are incompatible with the Sup2/Sup32 since they are non-fabric enabled supervisors.
For the 67XX cards you'll need a SUP/RSP720 Kind regards, Sibbi Þann 7.12.2011 22:10, skrifaði "Jeff Meyers" <[email protected]>: >Hello list, > >I am looking for a configuration, that makes sense. A 6509 is currently >equipped with a sup2, some 6516-GBIC modules and some 6148-GE-TX >modules. The sup2 will be replaced with a sup32-10GE soon but we're >having trouble with the interfaces modules as well. >When a customer bursts a GigE port on the 6148-GE-TX, the available >bandwidth on all other ports (at least ports 1-24 which seem to share an >asic) are affected as well although there is not more than just >2-3GBit/s of traffic on the whole module. What is the best choice here >to have reasonable amounts of bandwidth available across the whole box? > >The upcoming redundant sup32 will use a few GBit/s and the rest will be >required on the GBic and TX module. Both modules shall be capable of >consuming something around 8GBit/s+ in total without causing trouble on >the direct neighbour ports when bursting. > >Does it make sense to replace the 6148-GE-TX with a 6748 or is the sup2 >respectively the sup32 the actual bottleneck? > >Is there a way to find out the available bandwidth for each module in >the running configuration? > > >Thanks & best regards, >Jeff >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
